Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elias Ymer vs Gustavo Heide Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ymer vs Heide analysis and find out who is favored!
Elias Ymer vs Gustavo Heide Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ymer 1 - 0 Heide
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ymer has won 45.69% of points on his second serve, while Heide has won 53.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ymer, in recent form, has won 50.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Heide has won 45.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.08% and 34.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ymer has saved 57.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heide has saved 70.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ymer has won 43.66% of matches played (W/L 31/ 40), with Heide winning 65.08% (W/L 41/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ymer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 225/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10). Heide has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 101/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Ymer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Heide has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ymer winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ymer winning 2 and Heide winning 1. The last match between Ymer and Heide was at the Davis Cup, World Group, Q, SWE-BRA 1-3, 02-02-2024, Rubber 2, I.hard with Elias Ymer getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ymer and Heide have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ymer winning 1 times and Heide 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ymer winning 0, and Heide 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ymer has played against opponents with an average rank of 219.1 while Heide has played against players with an average rank of 258.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ymer has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heide has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ymer has converted 43.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heide has converted 33.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
182
Rank
105
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
174
Rank
174
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
55% (384-317)
Career Total W/L
65% (117-62)
33% (8-16)
YTD W/L
67% (14-7)
$919,255
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Elias Ymer | Gustavo Heide |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:0 | 1:47:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (34/64) | 55% (49/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 94% (32/34) | 67% (33/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (19/30) | 50% (20/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (36/89) | 20% (13/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Elias Ymer
Player
Gustavo Heide
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elias Ymer | Gustavo Heide |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (8/16) | 67% (14/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (21/34) | 63% (31/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (247/271) | 54% (253/214) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 13% (1/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 70% (14/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 79 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:45 | 1:53:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.04 | 233.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (969/1694) | 60% (921/1523) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (650/969) | 72% (667/921) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (325/725) | 53% (320/602) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (69/145) | 33% (55/166) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (642/1629) | 38% (578/1508) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 100% (3/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 69% (11/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 30% (7/23) | 67% (14/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/7) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 58% (12/7) | 80% (15/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 42% (12/5) | 20% (15/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 33% (6/2) |
Elias Ymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Elias Ymer
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Elias Ymer
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
119)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Denis Yevseyev
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Jan Choinski
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Elias Ymer
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Elias Ymer
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Elias Ymer
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
96)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Gustavo Heide Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Matteo Gigante
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Lukas Klein
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Gustavo Heide
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Dmitry Popko
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Gustavo Heide
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Arthur Gea
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Joao Fonseca
61%
(
79 of
129)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
106)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
38%
(
49 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Alexander Weis
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Ymer Vs Heide Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gustavo Heide
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
